Approved foreign ownership of restricted property is for owner-occupation
A worked RES examination question on foreign ownership, from our Paper 1 bank — with the rule it turns on, and why each of the four options is right or wrong.
The question
A foreign investor has been approved to buy a landed house on the mainland. He intends to let it out to tenants for the rental income while he lives abroad, treating it as an investment like any other.
Which statement is correct?
The answer, and why
Answer: C
The rule. Approved foreign ownership of restricted property is for owner-occupation. The owner may not let it out for investment income.
Why C is correct. He may not let it out; the approval is for owner-occupation.
The other options.
- A treats approval as freeing him to deal as he likes.
- B offers notification as a cure.
- D allows a short tenancy the rule does not permit.
Exam note. Owner-occupation is a condition of the approval, not a suggestion. A restricted property approved to a foreigner cannot be rented out.
More on Foreign ownership
Want a full paper instead of one question?
The free half-paper is 20 questions with a Section B case study, explained to this same depth. The paid sets are ten full 80-question papers across Paper 1 and Paper 2, every figure checked against the current IRAS, CEA, HDB, URA and SLA position.
Looking for past-year papers? CEA doesn't publish them — here's what it does publish.
Independent study material. Not affiliated with or endorsed by the Council for Estate Agencies. No pass guarantee — for study use only.