An independent RES exam study resource — not a Government website and not affiliated with the Council for Estate Agencies (CEA).Find My OrderHow to identify official CEA sources
Browse Papers
Home / Free RES questions / Foreign ownership

Paper 1 · Lesson 1 — Planning and Foreign Ownership

Foreign ownership

The Residential Property Act / LDAU regime: restricted (landed) vs non-restricted property, foreigner/PR approval, the whole-development rule, the 7-year rule, the Sentosa Cove cap and MOP, the nominee-trust bar.

2 questionsAnswers & explanations includedFree — no sign-up

Question 1

A foreign buyer is shown a development described in its brochure as "flats", and, reading the word as he would in ordinary speech, takes it to mean HDB flats. On that footing he concludes that the units must be public housing that a foreigner cannot freely buy, and tells his agent he will look elsewhere. His agent says he has misread the word as it is used in this field.

Which statement is correct?

  1. A. He is right to walk away; "flats" here means HDB, which he cannot freely buy.
  2. B. He has misread it; "flats" here means apartments, which he may buy without approval.
  3. C. He is partly right; "flats" here covers HDB and apartments without distinction.
  4. D. He has misread it; "flats" here means strata-landed units, which are restricted.
Show the answer and full explanation

Answer: B

The rule. In this field "flats" means apartments — non-landed private housing a foreigner may buy without approval. An HDB flat is meant only where "HDB" is stated expressly.

Why B is correct. The development of "flats" is apartments, which he may buy; his reading of the word as HDB, and his conclusion that he is shut out, is the error.

The other options.

  • A accepts his misreading.
  • C merges the two senses.
  • D makes flats a restricted landed form.

Exam note. Reading "flats" as HDB led him to the wrong conclusion about his own eligibility. The word means apartments unless the three letters "HDB" appear.

In this field "flats" means apartments — non-landed private housing a foreigner may buy without approval →

Question 2

A foreign investor has been approved to buy a landed house on the mainland. He intends to let it out to tenants for the rental income while he lives abroad, treating it as an investment like any other.

Which statement is correct?

  1. A. He may let it out, an approved owner being free to deal with the property as he likes.
  2. B. He may let it out provided he first tells the approving authority of it in writing.
  3. C. He may not let it out; approved foreign ownership is for owner-occupation.
  4. D. He may let it out for up to three years, but not on a longer tenancy than that.
Show the answer and full explanation

Answer: C

The rule. Approved foreign ownership of restricted property is for owner-occupation. The owner may not let it out for investment income.

Why C is correct. He may not let it out; the approval is for owner-occupation.

The other options.

  • A treats approval as freeing him to deal as he likes.
  • B offers notification as a cure.
  • D allows a short tenancy the rule does not permit.

Exam note. Owner-occupation is a condition of the approval, not a suggestion. A restricted property approved to a foreigner cannot be rented out.

Approved foreign ownership of restricted property is for owner-occupation →

Practise it under exam conditions

Single questions test whether you know a rule. The paper tests whether you can find it in a scenario, at speed, with three plausible alternatives in the way. Start with the free 20-question half-paper.

Free 20-question paperThe papers in PDF

Looking for past-year papers? CEA doesn't publish them — here's what it does publish.

Independent study material. Not affiliated with or endorsed by the Council for Estate Agencies. No pass guarantee — for study use only.