A caveat lodged without a caveatable interest exposes the person who lodged it to a claim in damages
A worked RES examination question on caveats, from our Paper 1 bank — with the rule it turns on, and why each of the four options is right or wrong.
The question
An owner discovers that a person with no genuine claim has lodged a caveat against his property, and that his sale has stalled as a result. The buyer's solicitor will not proceed while it stands, and the owner has already committed to another purchase.
Which statement most appropriately describes his position?
The answer, and why
Answer: A
The rule. A caveat lodged without a caveatable interest exposes the person who lodged it to a claim in damages. It is a warning, not an order, and it confers no ownership.
Why A is correct. He has a remedy against the person who lodged it.
The other options.
- B treats it as immovable
- C as a court order
- D as conferring a share of ownership.
Exam note. A caveat is easy to lodge and not free of consequence.
More on Caveats
Want a full paper instead of one question?
The free half-paper is 20 questions with a Section B case study, explained to this same depth. The paid sets are ten full 80-question papers across Paper 1 and Paper 2, every figure checked against the current IRAS, CEA, HDB, URA and SLA position.
Looking for past-year papers? CEA doesn't publish them — here's what it does publish.
Independent study material. Not affiliated with or endorsed by the Council for Estate Agencies. No pass guarantee — for study use only.