An independent RES exam study resource — not a Government website and not affiliated with the Council for Estate Agencies (CEA).Find My OrderHow to identify official CEA sources
← All negligence elements questions

Intention is not an element — it belongs to other torts

A worked RES examination question on negligence elements, from our Paper 1 bank — with the rule it turns on, and why each of the four options is right or wrong.

Paper 1Lesson 8Negligence elementsFree — no sign-up

The question

A buyer relied on an agent's careless statement about a property's remaining tenure and, on the strength of it, paid materially more than he otherwise would have. He now sues in negligence. The agent protests that he never meant to mislead anyone and had no wish to see the buyer lose a cent, and says that settles the matter. The buyer's own adviser had earlier warned him that a claim of this kind is not made out merely by showing that the agent said something wrong.

Which statement is correct?

  1. A. No; a negligence claim succeeds only if the agent meant the loss to occur.
  2. B. No; that the agent misstated the tenure does not by itself suffice.
  3. C. Yes; but only if the agent was shown to have acted dishonestly.
  4. D. Yes; the agent's want of care caused the loss, whatever his intention.

The answer, and why

Answer: D

The rule. Negligence requires a duty of care, a breach of it, and damage caused as a result. Intention is not an element — it belongs to other torts. A careless misstatement relied on to the claimant's loss makes out the claim whatever the agent meant.

Why D is correct. The agent owed the buyer a duty over the tenure information, misstated it carelessly, and the buyer overpaid in reliance. That the agent meant no harm is beside the point.

The other options.

  • A treats intention as a requirement of the claim.
  • C demands dishonesty, which negligence does not.
  • B takes the adviser's true warning — that a wrong statement alone is not enough — and misreads it as defeating a claim where breach, reliance and loss are all present.

Exam note. Negligence is about falling below a standard, not about meaning harm.

Want a full paper instead of one question?

The free half-paper is 20 questions with a Section B case study, explained to this same depth. The paid sets are ten full 80-question papers across Paper 1 and Paper 2, every figure checked against the current IRAS, CEA, HDB, URA and SLA position.

Looking for past-year papers? CEA doesn't publish them — here's what it does publish.

Independent study material. Not affiliated with or endorsed by the Council for Estate Agencies. No pass guarantee — for study use only.